Preamble
"Let the light of Chinese democracy shine even brighter, so that China can ... contribute to the building of a better, higher quality [form of] democracy for humanity in the 21st century."
I] At an event organised by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) in March 2023 - just days before U.S. President Joe Biden co-hosted his second virtual “Summit for Democracy” alongside the governments of Costa Rica, the Netherlands the Republic of Korea and Zambia - the Beijing-based event was entitled “The Second International Forum on Democracy: Shared Human Values”.
II] It was attended by Li Shulei (李书磊), a politburo member and the current head of China’s Central Propaganda Department, and featured keynote speeches by a number of Chinese and foreign politicians and academics.
III] The occasion may be interpreted as an objective to project that Chinese “democracy” is superior to what the West has to offer.
IV] The event might not even be to convince others to adopt China political system per se, but the underlying theme seems to posture such an outreach intention.
V] Tsinghua University’s Yan Yilong (鄢一龙 ) was one of those taking part in this forum. His address
CHINA AND THE WEST HAVE PROVIDED DIFFERENT ANSWERS TO THESE SIX QUESTIONS ON ‘DEMOCRACY’
is summarised below:
Although the West will not admit it, China’s “whole-process people's democracy” is not only true democracy at play, but is also a more functional type of democracy than that practised in Western countries.
Chinese democracy outclasses Western democratic electoral systems because of the complex processes it has developed which have allowed it “to move closer towards ‘the people being the masters of their own house’.” Unlike in China, procedural rather than substantive democracy best defines what is now practised in the West.
Chinese democracy recognises the existence of “the people” in its holistic sense. Only by doing so can one ensure the people’s “overall, long-term and fundamental interests”.
Chinese democracy belongs to the majority, not to a minority as in the West. Unlike in America, China is not “owned by the 1%, governed by the 1% and for the benefit of the 1%”. Low voter turnout in election-based political systems is another reason why, unlike in China, electoral democracies are not able to represent the people as a whole.
Western elections have become a “talent show”, where people vote for the best performer rather than for those who are best suited to govern.
The general population does not have the specialist knowledge nor the long-term perspective required to elect competent representatives who have their nation’s best interests at heart.
Chinese leaders are “tested through practice, not through votes”. Democracy in China thus ensures that “political amateurs with no experience or qualifications” cannot become its leaders.
Unlike in the West, China’s political system allows democracy to be practised “at both the input and output levels.” It is a system in which people are able to “participate fully” and one in which officials serve the people and actually get things done.
Western democracy encourages competition, confrontation and the fragmentation of interests, which leads to constant political bickering and deadlocks. Chinese democracy, in contrast, is a “consensus-finding process” that ensures that policymaking is always moving forwards with the country’s core objectives firmly in sight.
The conclusion by Yan:
“Let the flower of democracy in China bloom even more colourfully, let the light of Chinese democracy shine even brighter, so that China can help mankind transcend its narrow, superficial and inferior view of democracy and contribute to the building of a better, higher quality [form of] democracy for humanity in the 21st century.”
translated as a contribution by
Researcher, translator, and social studies teacher based in Shanghai; holder of a Master of Law, International Relations from Peking University.
Reposted under CreativeCommons with gratitude.